Outrageous Misleading Article in the London Times

The 'leading' article in today's Times consists of nothing more than a deluge of misinformation and feminist-inspired propaganda designed to stir up hatred towards men by claiming that many thousands of them are getting away with rape every year.

New readers will need to read two of my pieces to see the evidence which demonstrates quite clearly that the research into 'rape' is mostly politically-corrected hocus pocus, and, further, that the likelihood is very high that the vast majority of allegations currently made to the police concerning rape are false.

.............

Rape Baloney - 5 mins

The Home Office Caught Stirring Up Hatred Again - a detailed 20-minute read looking at the bogus research published by the Home Office in the UK.

..............

Let me show you how this appalling article in the Times does nothing but perpetuate lies.

Here are some extracts.

Last year the defendant in a Swansea rape trial was acquitted because the prosecution admitted it could not prove that the alleged victim had withheld her consent for sex. She had been drunk, and the judge directed the jury to return a verdict of not guilty.

The implication here is that women should not need to demonstrate that they did not consent to sex. The implication is that the onus should be on the defendant to prove his innocence. And please bear in mind that we have already reached a situation in the UK wherein the vast majority of rape accusations are most probably false.

As such, if men have to prove their innocence in these cases, thousands of innocent men will end up being convicted.

Barely 5 per cent of rape allegations result in convictions. A minority of such allegations may be groundless or weak, but most are not.. ... [This] reflects a shameful failure of the criminal justice system.

This is absolute rubbish. The Times can have no valid and sufficient evidence to make such a claim. When the police and the lawyers and the juries have done all the investigating that they possibly can, the result is that some 95% of cases are judged NOT GUILTY or NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE.

So, please tell me somebody. From where, exactly, does the Times get evidence that suggests the very opposite?

Well. I'll tell you where some of it comes from. It comes from the bogus research conducted by academic feminists - many of who have close links with the media feminists; such as those working for the Times!

[This]... amounts to a social tragedy visited on nearly 100,000 women a year, ...

If you read my second piece, you will see how this type of figure is typically conjured up. For example, the Crime Survey will have included such questions as, "Have you been pressured into having sex when you were not in the mood?"

And given that nearly all of us have probably experienced such a situation wherein we gave in to 'pressure', the 'rape' figures will include those of us who thought, "Hmmm. I've been pressured in the past. So I'll have to answer Yes."

If the crime at issue were murder, British justice would now be in the dock. The crime of rape damages its victims in less final but more complex ways and is necessarily harder to prosecute.

A very sly and cunning paragraph indeed! Look at it carefully. Firstly, it connects 'rape' with 'murder' in the mind of the reader - and then it suggests that the two are not very dissimilar - but, just in case the reader is unsure about this 'similarity', it moves quickly on to - and leaves the reader with - a notion that is definitely true - the fact that rape is harder to prosecute.

It is pure propaganda! The psychological seeds suggesting a similarity between rape and murder are carefully sown, and then quickly passed by - lest the readers dwell too much on this ridiculous notion - and the readers are cunningly left with a statement with which they are very likely to agree.

Furthermore, please always remember that most rapes are not committed by strangers. They are committed by intimates. And the notion that such rape experiences with intimates are likely to be in the same league as murder is nothing more than feminist-inspired hogwash.

Despite decades of investment in specialist sex crimes units, the nation's police forces still fail to refer up to two thirds of reported rapes to the Crown Prosecution Service. In half these cases the alleged victims withdraw from what is inevitably a traumatic process before referral.

... which is hardly surprising - given that most of their allegations are probably false.

In the other half, police decide that their cases will not stand up in court - and half of those that do reach the trial stage end in acquittal.

... which is hardly surprising - given that most of the allegations are probably false.

... it is not too soon to review what is clearly a failing system.

The only system that is seriously failing here is the one that allows the Times to disseminate such utter nonsense and still masquerade as a 'quality' newspaper.

Even the professionals who work in the field do not believe that the vast majority of allegations are true.

And if anyone should know, they should!

Indeed - and as just one example - according to Professor Jennifer Temkin from the University of Sussex, one female barrister said that, "There are lots of women who make complaints of rape who would sleep with the local donkey."

Sweeping social change over the past two generations has unquestionably emboldened women in ways that expose them more than ever to danger from potential rapists - whether as much-maligned 'ladettes' or simply enjoying their right to stay out late.

This might be true, but they have also experienced some 30+ years of the most ceaseless and pervasive propaganda imploring them to feel abused and to report their abuse. And the very notion that women are so angelic that they will not make false allegations in significant numbers in order to gain some advantage for themselves is just preposterous and entirely beyond belief.

But the Times makes no mention of this. It does not even mention the possibility that this might be true.

No Sirreee. One must never suggest that women are anything but angels - for every hour of their existence. And so it is that the Times must attempt to portray all women as innocent and all men as guilty when rape allegations are made.

For newcomers, I will summarise the real truth about the 'rape' figures.

Nobody has a clue what they are. Not. A. Clue.

For example, it could be 1 in 5, 1 in 50, 1 in 100 or even 99 in 100 of women who are 'raped' throughout their lives - because the figures for 'rape' depend entirely on the definitions of rape that are employed by the 'researchers' together with the evidence that they, themselves, choose to recognise as indicators of rape.

And because, nowadays, the vast majority of these 'researchers' are precious little more than politically-corrected androids, they will conjure up data and definitions that mix together everything in such a way that it all sounds credible enough to convince the public - and so make their masters happy.

And those researchers who are not, nowadays, politically-corrected enough, will not get funded, published or publicised.

.....

In order to add to my credibility, newcomers ought to know that I have been monitoring the 'rape' situation for some six or seven years now, that I have a PhD in Psychology, and that I used to teach statistics to social science undergraduates. And while I most certainly cannot claim to be an expert on the subject, in my view, the rape statistics and their meaning are almost pure propaganda. This ubiquitous propaganda is disseminated by many VERY POWERFUL groups. Generally speaking, some of these groups use this propaganda to generate funding, some to grow empires - ideological and institutional - and some to pursue the feminist agenda. And many women, of course, collude with this in order to empower themselves within their relationships. I am not suggesting that there are not 'many' rapes. What I do believe, however, is that the vast majority of allegations currently made to the police are false, that they are mostly made for malicious reasons, and that, in fact, the oft-quoted rape statistics are completely and utterly bogus. Indeed, give me some funding, and I can 'discover' just about any figures that you want when it comes to this issue.

And the same is true when it comes to issues such as 'domestic violence'.

.

11 Comments:

At 30 March, 2006 04:30, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Your usal insightful analysis - thank god there are people out there like you who stand up for mens rights and are not afraid to speak the truth!

Well done and keep it up!

 
At 30 March, 2006 05:23, Anonymous Anonymous said...

My limited experience in being associated with the criminal justice system has led me into knowledge of about 8 cases of reported rape. 4 of these were dropped after the complainants admitted to officers they had made them up.
How many of these were prosecuted....none !!
I await the public outcry and demands for a better conviction rape for false allegations. Of the other 4 rapes, 2 refused medical exams and so its not likely there was ever a realistic chance of prosecution.
It is likely to cause more animosity between genders if men start getting arrested because they have 'scored' with a woman who the next morning decides she didn't like the idea of sleeping with a bloke who looked ok when she was a bit tipsy.
I wonder if men will make counter allegations of sexual assault against these women, claiming that they were drunk and these women took advantage of them? It's a nightmare to sort out and in addition to men being warned, perhaps women could wear badges stating they are out on the town to get 'pissed' and they do not consent to any intercourse. People should all know where they stand !!
No good man condones a rape of a woman. Likewise, good women should not condone a false allegation.

 
At 30 March, 2006 06:33, Blogger angryharry said...

You can email the times here,

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,564-2110853,00.html

 
At 30 March, 2006 08:01, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This site is absolutely fantastic. Men need to stand up and for their own rights, now and in the future. Ok, that goes without saying. The point is I feel, that without logical minds that have obviously read more than the rubbish in broadsheet and tabloid papers, men will become enveloped in a world of meaningless arguments with no reason or logic to back them up. No one ever wins an argument. Read War and Peace.

I am at university. Femenism is rife. Girls tell me that they are femenists and to be honest, when i ask them what they stand for, they turn and gaze, they are genuinly not very sure. If i ask them if they feel that vibrators are ruining the modern relationship along with white wine and a general disdain for male company, they dont seem to understand the depth of the question.

It is a fashion. The independant woman. Conceited. Educated. Opinionated. A master of her own environment and pleasure. The ultimate revenge for the damaged heart and ego. A rape allegation! Confused and bittered, it is the ultimate in female power.

Get a bit drunk last night did you? Get laid by a good looking bloke? Actually felt a natural impulse taking over? Oh dear! Disaster! He didnt give you the chance to ignore his calls because he's already doing the walk of shame? Well you could always exact your revenge by a particular allegation of rape.

Without people like angry harry all men will be doomed. Doomed. Dead. Rubbish. On the scrap heap.

Yes yes yes. Harry is the man. All of my mates feeling entrenched in a world of female rights and hypocritic women can rest easy. Harry, they will all know about you very very soon.

 
At 30 March, 2006 08:15, Anonymous RupertBear said...

Auberon Waugh once suggested that any woman should be able to have any man imprisoned for rape simply by sending a postcard to the police. Lots of feminists would agree.

 
At 30 March, 2006 14:50, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maybe Auberon Waugh's suggestion would be liberating.

Maybe it would be sufficient a threat to WAKE MEN UP to the control women now exercise over them through their imposition of one-sided sexual mores, romantic fantasies and through women's determined domination of the whole reproductive, child rearing and early learning processes.

Maybe giving women the power to ruin any man at will would help free men from women, because a man needs a woman like an addict needs heroin. We need to kick this destructive dependence.

 
At 31 March, 2006 06:29, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Taking this to a logical conclusion I would assume that all crimes not just rape have low detection/conviction rates. So why rape in particular is singled out for special treatment.

All things being equal why are there not more women in prison? Maybe we need to distort a few more laws to ensure that more women are convicted for crimes.

 
At 01 April, 2006 12:46, Blogger Mercurior said...

once again harry does it best. i have been a long time reader, and harry makes a lot of sense.

there are less women in prison as the judges feel that women are the weaker sex, and that women can do no wrong. look at the crimes the same crime, if a man did it 20 years if a woman 2..

 
At 26 April, 2006 11:46, Anonymous Anonymous said...

First comment is correct in that false allegations of rape should be prosecuted.

The Observer did a piece on women would made false allegations because they KNEW that they could get away with them.

 
At 17 June, 2006 16:00, Blogger Lepidopterist said...

How come nobody has gotten down the the bones here?
The essence of allowing a woman such freedom to allege rape is that, when a man is screwing a woman, what he is really doing is acting as a dildo - he has no real autonomy of his own and he is merely doing somthing for the good of the woman.
The idea is to make it so that the man has little or no control or rights and the woman has all the power: thus men are more like gigalos than actual human beings.

The law has become rape.

 
At 19 October, 2006 11:25, Anonymous james said...

Its just a pity a small few will read this, for every one who does there are a hundred going on with there lives soaking up this rubbish and believing it! I wonder what turn our society will take next. Can you please do some more posts like this, there is a espcially crap article full of rubbish called 'free at last, the new alpha teenage girls.' This shows blatent sexism, utter rubbish which has gone un challenged and stiking it's crap in the minds of millions.
What is our society coming to?

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home