We're Far Too Nice To Muslim Extremists

.

We're Far Too Nice To Muslim Extremists The usual immigrant experience of gradual integration has failed for more than a third of Muslims. All the exhaustive and intrusive efforts of the race relations industry have been counter-productive. Minette Marrin

The Policy Exchange report argues that this alienation is largely due to more than 20 years of official multiculturalism. This benighted orthodoxy has emphasised differences and divisions and promoted a sense of grievance that is sometimes almost paranoid. This amounts to full-blown victimhood, whipped up not just by Muslim spokesmen but also by non-Muslim journalists and commentators and human rights activists in the victim industry ...


Indeed, this is one of the reasons why I am so opposed to the continual stirring up of hatred towards men by the feminists and the government, and, in particular, towards 'WHITE' men by these same groups, as well as by the self-serving politically-corrected left-leaning whites.

All they do is stir up hatred toward us - their very own people - usually by calling us racists - when, for example, we merely dare to complain about such things as over-excessive immigration and the numerous problems that this brings.

We already have enough hatred felt towards us in this country - for numerous reasons - most of them bogus - without groups of white people trying to profit by making things worse; such as trying to gain electoral advantage, or getting funding for their various activist groups.

And, of course, as a by-product, they are also inflaming hatred towards us right around the world!

In a nutshell: When, for example, feminists - or whoever - stir up hatred towards the white men in this country, then this simply endorses any negative feelings that others - not in this country - might have for us.

And white men are certainly not the majority in the world. Far from it. 'White' men make up only about 5% of the world's population.

And this world is an increasingly dangerous place!

As such, these politically-corrected phonies are actually being highly treacherous with regard to their very own people, and they are actually putting us in danger - as well as stoking up a fistful of serious, long-term problems for us.

I am not suggesting that we should discriminate against non-white people or, in any way, treat them badly. On the contrary, I do not think that they are any better or worse than we are. Furthermore, I am really delighted to see so many developing countries progressing so well, on so many fronts, and I hope that we can help them to do even better.

These are exciting times!

But when it comes to mixing cultures and, in some cases, mixing races together within environments that are not yet ready to bear such a mixture, the evidence suggests that huge, serious, long-term problems can easily unfold.

And, in my view, simply in order to feather their own nests, the left-leaning politically-corrected 'liberals' are purposely stoking up and inflaming these problems, and - as explained - they are also purposely stirring up hatred towards us.

Well, quite simply, if we let them continue to get away with this, they will surely end up destroying our culture, our future, and, indeed, 'us'.


.

5 Comments:

At 05 February, 2007 10:03, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yes but those mohamedans and indeed other nationals historically had nothing to do without their own national borders.

They have not needed white land for anything whatsoever. It is whites who have needed and intruded onto them. For imperial, economic and political expansionist projects.

The afghanis hated the russians more than they hate you. The indians, pakistanis and bangladesis hated each other more than they hate you. The shites and suunis hate each other more than they ever allegedly hate you.

What they cant stand or tolorate is for you and to forcibly intrude into their lands disguised as friends or liberators in order to exploit and dominate them [a customary practise allegedly favouring women in domestics matters in all your own lands].

You need to withdraw that stated assumption that white men have no hand in what is happening before our eyes across the globe. Your domestic political method of mutual treachery has been spread beyond your jurisdiction and thus you are responsible for a lot that has gone wrong.

Especially in areas where you assert but cannot justify a strategic interest.

You know as well as I that the Iranian nuclear development [assisted by pakistan] and other matters would have taken a different course had white men behaved better towards each other. ... and hence recognised the purpose in other men of respect and dignity.

 
At 05 February, 2007 10:10, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Forgot to state this AH

It is not so much your racism that upsets the world order, far from it[every one prefers theiir won people] but your cross-mutual perfidy as spread toward others

 
At 05 February, 2007 11:49, Blogger angryharry said...

Grow up. There is not one single racist statement in what I wrote

 
At 09 February, 2007 03:22, Blogger Mercurior said...

so its ok to be racist against white people. white people are always at fault, because of their skin colour.

please read what he said..

**I am not suggesting that we should discriminate against non-white people or, in any way, treat them badly. On the contrary, I do not think that they are any better or worse than we are**

but when any group is treated better than any other, thats racism/sexism. regardless of who they are, to give a job to a woman because she is a woman thats sexist against men.

to do anything for a reason, like they are muslims, thats religious discrimination, even if you change it to catholics, thats still it.

if a asian man gets a job for the colour of his skin thats racism, it should be the same for a person of black skin, or white..

bending over too far to accomodate one group over others, well you then get it in the arse.

the people who see ah as racist, are in themselves being racist, he isnt allowed to make comments, about other cultures because he is a white man???

 
At 10 February, 2007 01:14, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Angry harry should not be duped into agreeing with just about any body who uses the term "we". Especially where such persons are in-fact naturalised but stealth enemies of the "indiginous we".

Otherwise the naturalised Minette Marrins in the guise of "we", themselves decended of a people whom have always been at loggerheads with muslims, will goad the "indiginous we" into unprofitable querrels with so called too softly treated terrorists.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home